Effects of Joint Angle on Inter- and Intra-individual Variability for Women During Isometric Fatiguing Tasks Anchored to a Perceptual Intensity

Jocelyn E. Arnett^1, , Robert W. Smith¹, Tyler J. Neltner¹, John Paul V. Anders², Dolores G. Ortega¹, Terry J. Housh¹, Richard J. Schmidt¹ and Glen O. Johnson¹

¹Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68510, USA

²Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Cite this paper

Jocelyn E. Arnett, Robert W. Smith, Tyler J. Neltner, John Paul V. Anders, Dolores G. Ortega, Terry J. Housh, Richard J. Schmidt and Glen O. Johnson. Effects of Joint Angle on Inter- and Intra-individual Variability for Women During Isometric Fatiguing Tasks Anchored to a Perceptual Intensity. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2023; 11(1):7-21. doi: 10.12691/AJSSM-11-1-2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the composite, inter-individual, and intra-individual differences in the fatigue-induced torque, electromyographic (EMG), and mechanomyographic (MMG) patterns of responses during sustained, isometric fatiguing tasks anchored to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) at elbow joint angles (JA) of 75° and 125°. Nine women (age: 21.0±3.0 yrs; height: 169.3±8.1 cm; body mass: 68.4±7.4 kg) performed 2,3s forearm flexion maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) before and after sustained, isometric forearm flexion tasks anchored to RPE = 8 to task failure (defined as torque reduced to zero) at JA75 and JA125. The EMG and MMG signals were recorded from the biceps brachii (BB). Polynomial regression analyses (linear and quadratic) were performed to examine the patterns for the torque, neuromuscular responses, and neuromuscular efficiency (NME) vs. time relationships. Six, separate 2 (Joint Angle: 75° vs 125°) x 2 (Time: Initial vs 5%TTF) repeated measures ANOVAs were performed to assess the mean differences for the torque and neuromuscular parameters values between the initial value and the value at 5%TTF. At JA75, there were significant (p≤0.05) negative torque (quadratic), EMG amplitude (AMP) (linear), EMG mean power frequency (MPF) (quadratic), MMG MPF (linear), and NME (linear) vs. time relationships. At JA125, there were significant (p≤0.05) negative torque (quadratic), EMG AMP (quadratic), EMG MPF (linear), MMG MPF (linear), and NME (linear) vs. time relationships. MMG AMP, however, did not change across time (p≥0.05) at JA75 or JA125. The individual neuromuscular responses varied from the composite data within and between JA75 and JA125. These findings indicated that for torque, joint angle did not affect the composite and individual responses when anchored to RPE = 8. There was, however, substantial inter- and intra-individual variability in the neuromuscular responses that may be specific to the joint angle at which the tasks were performed.

Keywords

female, ratings of perceived exertion, fatigue, electromyography, mechanomyography, forearm flexion, neuromuscular

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	Enoka RM, Stuart DG. Neurobiology of muscle fatigue. J Appl Physiol 1992; 72: 1631-48.
[2]	Kluger BM, Krupp LB, Enoka RM. Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses. Neurology 2013; 80: 409-16.
[3]	Enoka RM, Duchateau J. Translating Fatigue to Human Performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 2228-38.
[4]	Keller JL, Housh TJ, Anders JPV, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. Anchor Scheme, Intensity, and Time to Task Failure do not Influence Performance Fatigability or Changes in Neuromuscular Responses following Bilateral Leg Extensions. J Exerc Physiol Online 2020; 23: 119-34.
[5]	Keller JL, Housh TJ, Anders JPV, Neltner TJ, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. Similar performance fatigability and neuromuscular responses following sustained bilateral tasks above and below critical force. Eur J Appl Physiol 2021; 121: 1111-24.
[6]	Place N, Maffiuletti NA, Ballay Y, Lepers R. Twitch potentiation is greater after a fatiguing submaximal isometric contraction performed at short vs. long quadriceps muscle length. J Appl Physiol 2005; 98: 429-36.
[7]	Arnett JE, Smith RW, Neltner TJ, Anders JPV, Housh TJ, Schmidt RJ, et al. The RPE Clamp Model and Fatigability Following a Sustained, Isometric Task to Failure. J Exerc Physiol Online 2022; 25: 13-26.
[8]	Arnett JE, Smith RW, Neltner TJ, Anders JPV, Ortega DG, Housh TJ, et al. The Effects of Joint Angle and Anchoring Scheme on Performance Fatigability and Neuromuscular Responses Following Isometric Forearm Flexion Tasks to Failure. NeuroSports 2023; 1: 1-30.
[9]	Keller JL, Housh TJ, Hill EC, Smith CM, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. Self-regulated force and neuromuscular responses during fatiguing isometric leg extensions anchored to a rating of perceived exertion. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2019; 44: 343-50.
[10]	Keller JL, Housh TJ, Hill EC, Smith CM, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. Are There Sex-Specific Neuromuscular or Force Responses to Fatiguing Isometric Muscle Actions Anchored to a High Perceptual Intensity? J Strength Cond Res 2022; 36: 156-61.
[11]	Keller JL, Housh TJ, Hill EC, Smith CM, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. Neuromuscular responses of recreationally active women during a sustained, submaximal isometric leg extension muscle action at a constant perception of effort. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118: 2499-508.
[12]	Smith R, J. Housh T, Paul V. Anders J, J. Neltner T, E. Arnett J, G. Ortega D, et al. Torque and Neuromuscular Responses are not Joint Angle Dependent During a Sustained, Isometric Task Anchored to a High Perceptual Intensity. Am J Sports Sci Med 2022; 10: 29-39.
[13]	Smith RW, Anders JPV, Neltner TJ, Arnett JE, Keller JL, Housh TJ, et al. Perceptual Fatigability and Neuromuscular Responses During a Sustained, Isometric Forearm Flexion Muscle Action Anchored to a Constant Level of Perceived Exertion. NeuroSports 2021; 1: 2.
[14]	Smith RW, Housh TJ, Anders JPV, Neltner TJ, Arnett JE, Schmidt RJ, et al. Time course of changes in torque and neuromuscular parameters during a sustained isometric forearm flexion task to fatigue anchored to a constant rating of perceived exertion. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2022; 10: 29-39.
[15]	Smith RW, Housh TJ, Anders JPV, Neltner TJ, Arnett JE, Schmidt RJ, et al. Application of the Ratings of Perceived Exertion-Clamp Model to Examine the Effects of Joint Angle on the Time Course of Torque and Neuromuscular Responses During a Sustained, Isometric Forearm Flexion to Task Failure. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: 1023-33.
[16]	Smith RW, Housh TJ, Arnett JE, Anders JPV, Neltner TJ, Ortega DG, et al. Utilizing the RPE-Clamp model to examine interactions among factors associated with perceived fatigability and performance fatigability in women and men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2023.
[17]	Tucker R. The anticipatory regulation of performance: the physiological basis for pacing strategies and the development of a perception-based model for exercise performance. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 392-400.
[18]	Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. J Appl Physiol 2014; 117: 1215-30.
[19]	Smith CM, Housh TJ, Herda TJ, Zuniga JM, Camic CL, Bergstrom HC, et al. Time course of changes in neuromuscular parameters during sustained isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 2697-702.
[20]	Camic CL, Housh TJ, Zuniga JM, Russell Hendrix C, Bergstrom HC, Traylor DA, et al. Electromyographic and mechanomyographic responses across repeated maximal isometric and concentric muscle actions of the leg extensors. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013; 23: 342-8.
[21]	Anders JPV, Smith CM, Keller JL, Hill EC, Housh TJ, Schmidt RJ, et al. Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions. Sports 2019; 7: 175.
[22]	Huijing PA. Mechanical muscle models. Strength and Power in Sport. PV Komi 1992.
[23]	Petrofsky JS. Computer analysis of the surface EMG during isometric exercise. Comput Biol Med 1980; 10: 83-95.
[24]	Downer AH. Strength, of the Elbow Flexor Muscles. Phys Ther 1953; 33: 68-70.
[25]	Kulig K, Andrews JG, Hay JG. Human strength curves. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1984; 12: 417-66.
[26]	Singh M, Karpovich PV. Strength of forearm flexors and extensors in men and women. J Appl Physiol 1968; 25: 177-80.
[27]	Weir JP, Ayers KM, Lacefield JF, Walsh KL. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during fatigue in humans: influence of muscle length. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 81: 352-9.
[28]	McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES, Martin DT, Mujika I, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, et al. Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 317-31.
[29]	Gearhart Jr RF, Goss FL, Lagally KM, Jakicic JM, Gallagher J, Robertson RJ. Standardized scaling procedures for rating perceived exertion during resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15: 320-5.
[30]	Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, Lenz B, Dixon C, Timmer J, et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 333-41.
[31]	Keller JL, Housh TJ, Smith CM, Hill EC, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. Sex-related differences in the accuracy of estimating target force using percentages of maximal voluntary isometric contractions vs. ratings of perceived exertion during isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 3294-300.
[32]	Albertus Y, Tucker R, Gibson ASC, Lambert EV, Hampson DB, Noakes TD. Effect of distance feedback on pacing strategy and perceived exertion during cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 461-8.
[33]	Robertson RJ, Noble BJ. 15 Perception of Physical Exertion: Methods, Mediators, and Applications. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1997; 25: 407-52.
[34]	Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10: 361-74.
[35]	Kwatny E, Thomas DH, Kwatny HG. An application of signal processing techniques to the study of myoelectric signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1970: 303-13.
[36]	Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-40.
[37]	Jones AA, Power GA, Herzog W. History dependence of the electromyogram: Implications for isometric steady-state EMG parameters following a lengthening or shortening contraction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2016; 27: 30-8.
[38]	Weir JP, Vincent WJ. Statistics in Kinesiology. Human Kinetics; 2020.
[39]	Wickens TD, Keppel G. Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Pearson Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2004.
[40]	Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 1994; 6: 284.
[41]	Hill EC, Housh TJ, Keller JL, Smith CM, Anders JV, Schmidt RJ, et al. Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 425-41.
[42]	Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155-63.
[43]	Lagally K, Robertson R. Construct Validity of the OMNI Resistance Exercise Scale. J Strength Cond Res Natl Strength Cond Assoc 2006; 20: 252-6.
[44]	Pincivero DM, Coelho AJ, Campy RM, Salfetnikov Y, Suter E. Knee extensor torque and quadriceps femoris EMG during perceptually-guided isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003; 13: 159-67.
[45]	Amann M, Wan H-Y, Thurston TS, Georgescu VP, Weavil JC. On the Influence of Group III/IV Muscle Afferent Feedback on Endurance Exercise Performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2020; 48: 209-16.
[46]	Marcora S. Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles, heart, and lungs. J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 2060-2.
[47]	Pageaux B. Perception of effort in Exercise Science: Definition, measurement and perspectives. Eur J Sport Sci 2016; 16: 1-10.
[48]	Zénon A, Sidibe M, Olivier E. Disrupting the Supplementary Motor Area Makes Physical Effort Appear Less Effortful. J Neurosci 2015; 35: 8737-44.
[49]	Bigland-Ritchie B, Rice CL, Garland SJ, Walsh ML. Task-dependent factors in fatigue of human voluntary contractions. Fatigue, Springer; 1995, p. 361-80.
[50]	Maclaren DP, Gibson H, Parry-Billings M, Edwards RH. A review of metabolic and physiological factors in fatigue. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1989; 17: 29-66.
[51]	Beck TW, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Weir JP, Cramer JT, Coburn JW, et al. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004; 14: 555-64.
[52]	Miller RG, Giannini D, Milner-Brown HS, Layzer RB, Koretsky AP, Hooper D, et al. Effects of fatiguing exercise on high-energy phosphates, force, and EMG: Evidence for three phases of recovery. Muscle Nerve 1987; 10: 810-21.
[53]	Contessa P, De Luca CJ, Kline JC. The compensatory interaction between motor unit firing behavior and muscle force during fatigue. J Neurophysiol 2016; 116: 1579-85.
[54]	Taylor J, Amann M, Duchateau J, Meeusen R, Rice C. Neural Contributions to Muscle Fatigue. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 1.
[55]	Heckman CJ, Enoka RM. Motor Unit. In: Terjung R, editor. Compr. Physiol. 1st ed., Wiley; 2012, p. 2629-82.
[56]	Allen DG, Lamb GD, Westerblad H. Skeletal Muscle Fatigue: Cellular Mechanisms. Physiol Rev 2008; 88: 287-332.
[57]	Hureau TJ, Broxterman RM, Weavil JC, Lewis MT, Layec G, Amann M. On the role of skeletal muscle acidosis and inorganic phosphates as determinants of central and peripheral fatigue: a 31P-MRS study. J Physiol 2022.
[58]	Neltner TJ, Housh TJ, Smith CM, Keller JL, Hill EC, Schmidt RJ, et al. Similar Fatigue-Induced Changes in Neuromuscular Patterns of Responses for Contralateral Legs during Maximal Bilateral Leg Extensions. J Exerc Physiol Online 2020; 23: 1-17.
[59]	Hunter SK. Sex differences in fatigability of dynamic contractions. Exp Physiol 2016; 101: 250-5.