Comparision of Communication Levels and Personality Characteristics of the Students Who Study at İstanbul Gelişim Universty

Kubilay Çimen¹, Türker Bıyıklı¹, Ünsal TAZEGÜL^1, and Özdemir ATAR¹

¹School of Physical Education and Sports, İstanbul Gelişim University İstanbul /Turkey

Cite this paper

Kubilay Çimen, Türker Bıyıklı, Ünsal TAZEGÜL and Özdemir ATAR. Comparision of Communication Levels and Personality Characteristics of the Students Who Study at İstanbul Gelişim Universty. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2016; 4(2):39-43. doi: 10.12691/AJSSM-4-2-3

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to compare the students of physical education and sport college communication skills and characters with the other students who study the other department at İstanbul Gelişim Universty. In order to collect data, communication skills inventory and scanned Eysenck personality questionnaire-shortened is used in the study. While the students of Fine Arts, Physical Education and Sport College and Architecture compose the population of this study, 130 Artchitecture, 133 Fine Arts and 164 Physical Education and Sport College compose the sample of this study. SPSS 15 packets program were used for interpreting data. “Kolmogorov-Smirnov” test is used to specify wherever the data has normal distribution or not, ''Anova-Homogenety of variance” test is used to specify whether it is homogenous or not and it has been specified that the data has normal distribution and homogenous. Definer statistical was used to analyze data, one way variance analysis test is used to identify between more than one varying and the Tukey test was used to specify the relation of varying. At the end of the study it was examined that the students of Physcal Education and Sport College have better communication skills and they are the most extroverted individuals.

Keywords

communication skill, personality, student, sportsman

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	Alpman, C. (1972). In the Integration of Education Physical Education and Its Development Along Centuries. National Education Printing House: İstanbul.
[2]	Filiz, Z. (2010). Evaluation of the Participation to the Sports For the Socializing of the University Students. Niğde University Physical Education and Sports Sciences Journal Volume 4, Issue 3, 192-203.
[3]	Öztürk, O.(1997). Ruh Sağlığı ve Bozuklukları, Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği. Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., ve Zanas, J. (1992). Gender, appraisal, and coping: A longitude in alanalysis. Journal of Personality, 60, 747-770.Feist, J. (1990).Theories of Personality, McNeese State University.
[4]	Kuru, E. (2003). Farklı Statüdeki Beden Eğitimi Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Kişilik Özellikleri, G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 23(1):175-191.Tazegül, Ü. (2014). Researching of the Effect of Sports on Personality, International Journal of Social Science,25, 537-544.
[5]	Tazegül, Ü. (2012). Determination of the Relationship Between Personality Characteristics of Wrestlers and Their Dealing with Stress Styles. Published Master Degree Thesis, Dumlupınar University, Health Sciences Institute, Physical Education and Sports Sciences Department, Ankara.
[6]	Güney, S. (2000). Behavior Sciencesand Management Psychology Terms Dictionary: Nobel Publishing and Delivery: Ankara.
[7]	Hançerlioğlu, O. (1993). Mental science Dictionary.2nd Press. Remzi Book Store: İstanbul.
[8]	Geçtan, E. (2004). Psychoanalysis and after of it. Metis Publishing: İstanbul.
[9]	Cüceloğlu, D. (2002). Human and His Attitude, 10th Press, Remzi BookSotre: İstanbul.
[10]	Oskay, Ü. (1993). Fromthe XIX centurytotoday a theoretical approach to the mass media’s cultural functions. İstanbul: Der
[11]	Budak, S. (2005). Dictionary of Psychology (3, Basım). Ankara: Art and Science.
[12]	Köknel, Ö. (2005). Understanding Human (8. Basım). İstanbul: Altın Kitaplar.
[13]	Gürgen, H. (1997). Quality of communication in organization. İstanbul: Der.
[14]	Ersanlı, K and Balcı, S (1998) “İletişim Becerileri Envanterinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması’’, Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 10 (2), s. 7-12.
[15]	Aydemir, Ö., Köroğlu. (2009). Clinical Scales whichu se in Psychistry. Ankara: Hekimler Birliği Yayınları
[16]	Yıldız, M., Tekin, M., and Lök, S. (2009). A Research on Personality Types of Soccer Players in DifferentStatus, Selçuk University, Institute of SocialSciencesPeriodical /22
[17]	Tepeköylü Öztürk, Ö., Soytürk, M.,Daşdan Ada, E.N., Çamlıyer, H. (2011). Comarison of the Communication Skilllevels of the Students that are Sportsmen in Varsities and the ones that do not do Sports, Sports Sciences Journal, Hacettepe J. of Sport Sciences, 22 (2), 43–53
[18]	Tepeköylü Ö, Soytürk M, Çamlıyer H. (2009). In terms of Some Variances Examination of the Communication Skill Perception of Students that study at Physical Education and Sports Academy. Sport meter Physical Education and Sports Sciences Journal. 7(3): 115-124
[19]	Soyer, F., Can, Y. ve Türkel, Ç. (2010). Examination of Relationship Between Primary School Students Participation to the Sportive Activities Level and Their Communication Skill . Sakarya University Faculty of Education Journal, 19, 73.
[20]	Bayram, L. (2013). Effect of the Regular Sport Doing on the Social Adaptation and Communication skills of the Children and Youths in Reformatories. Doctorate Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University Health Sciences Institute, Samsun.
[21]	Türkel, Ç. (2010). Examination of the Relationships Between Primary School Students Participation to the Sportive Activities and Social Adaptation and Communication Skill Levels. Master Degree Thesis Erciyes University Social Sciences Institute, Kayseri.
[22]	Arslan F, Bayraktar G, Akdoğan S. (2006). Examination of the personal characteristics of the students that do amateur and professional sports at the physical education and sports academy and the ones that do not do sports actively. Atatürk University Physical Education and Sports Sciences Journal. 8 (2), 40-47.
[23]	Tazegül, Ü (2014). Güreşçilerin Kişilik Özellikleri ile Stresle Başa Çıkma Tarzları Arasındaki İlişkinin Belirlenmesi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Ana Bilim Dalı , Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kütahta.
[24]	Tiryaki, Ş. (2000). Sports Psychology Notions, The oriesand Application. 1st Press, September Publishing House: İstanbul.
[25]	Tiryaki, Ş., Erdil, G., Acar, M., Emlel, Y. (1991). Personality characteristics of Sportsmen and the ones that do not do Sports. Sports Medicine Journal, 26(1), s.19-23.
[26]	Kirkcaldy, B. D., Shephard, R., Siefen. G. (2002). The relationship between physicalactivity and self–image and problem behavior among adolescents. Social Psychiatry Epidemiol, 37: 544-50.