A Novel Approach that Ameliorates Motor Disabilities and Improves Range of Motion of Joints; Comparison with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

Vinicius Monteiro Diederichs^1,

¹Visiting Kinesiologist at John Cabot University, Italy

Cite this paper

Vinicius Monteiro Diederichs. A Novel Approach that Ameliorates Motor Disabilities and Improves Range of Motion of Joints; Comparison with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2018; 6(1):15-21. doi: 10.12691/AJSSM-6-1-4

Abstract

A novel approach significantly more effective both in ameliorating motor disabilities and in improving range of motion (ROM) of joints when compared with the current standard approach, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). A total of 56 participants – of both genders, BMI normal, mean age 35 (range 21-68 years), exhibiting lumbopelvic extensor stiffness (assessed by performance of the deep squat test) - engaged in two experiments. Joint ROM was evaluated before and after treatment in each experiment. Participants were photographed performing the deep squat test and their joint ROM calculated with Kinovea software to obtain the data. In Experiment 1, twenty-six participants were randomly divided into two groups in order to compare the degree of improvement in ROM. One group was treated using the novel approach and the control group with PNF, both for three minutes duration. Results: statistically the effect size of the novel approach proved greater compared to the control PNF. In Experiment 2, thirty participants were treated only with the novel approach, motor disability being assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after five to seven days. Results: the novel approach proved significantly effective in ameliorating motor disabilities. Conclusion: the novel treatment is effective both in improving ROM of joints and in ameliorating motor disabilities. Moreover, in Experiment 2 the participants were assessed five to seven days after treatment, demonstrating that the improvement in ROM as well as the amelioration of motor disabilities is long lasting. Additionally, the degree of improvement in joint ROM observed in Experiment 1 finds confirmation in Experiment 2. Strikingly, after performance of the novel approach all the participants reported a pleasant sensation of lightness in walking - a phenomenon termed sensory attenuation, the term signifying the matching between sensory prediction and outcome.

Keywords

joint stiffness, capability, affordance, muscle spindles, myotatic reflex, recalibration, joint impedance

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	Page P. Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb; 7(1): 109-19.
[2]	Gregory JE, Wise AK, Wood SA, Prochazka A, Proske U. Muscle history, fusimotor activity and the human stretch reflex. J Physiol. 1998 Dec 15; 513 (Pt 3): 927-34.
[3]	Tsay A, Savage G, Allen TJ, Proske U. Limb position sense, proprioceptive drift and muscle thixotropy at the human elbow joint. J Physiol. 2014 Jun 15;5 92(12): 2679-94.
[4]	Bosco G, Poppele RE. Proprioception from a spinocerebellar perspective. Physiol Rev. 2001 Apr; 81(2): 539-68.
[5]	Burgess PR, Clark FJ. Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Aug; 203(2): 317-35.
[6]	Grigg P, Greenspan BJ. Response of primate joint afferent neurons to mechanical stimulation of knee joint. J Neurophysiol. 1977 Jan; 40(1): 1-8.
[7]	Lee H, Rouse EJ, Krebs HI. Summary of Human Ankle Mechanical Impedance During Walking. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med. 2016 4, 1-7.
[8]	Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 May; 9(3): 396-409.
[9]	Elwardany SH, El-Sayed WH, Ali MF. Reliability of kinovea computer program in measuring cervical range of motion in sagittal plane. Open Access Libr J. 2015 Sep 30; 2(9): 1.
[10]	Monticone M, Baiardi P, Ferrari S, Foti C, Mugnai R, Pillastrini P, Vanti C, Zanoli G. Development of the Italian version of the Owestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultral adaptation, reliably, and validity study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 Sep1; 34(19): 2090-5.
[11]	van Hooff M, Mannion AF, Staub LP, Ostelo RW, Fairbank JC. Determination of the Owestry Disability Index score equivalent to a “satisfactory symptom state” in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study. 2016 Spine J. 16(10): 1221-1230.
[12]	Chiba R, Takakusaki K, Ota J, Yozu A, Haga N. Human upright posture control models based on multisensory inputs; in fast and slow dynamics. Neurosci Res. 2016 Mar 1;104(Supplement C): 96-104.
[13]	Nakajima T, Mezzarane RA, Komiyama T, Zehr EP. Reflex control of human locomotion: Existence, features and functions of common interneuronal system induced by multiple sensory inputs in humans. J Phys Fit Sports Med. 2015 May 25; 4(2): 197-211.
[14]	Buhrmann T, Di Paolo EA. Spinal circuits can accommodate interaction torques during multijoint limb movements. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014; 8: 144.
[15]	Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Burke D. The circuitry of the human spinal cord - spinal and corticospinal mechanisms of movement. 1st edition. Cambridge University Press; 2012, 127-128, 527.
[16]	Mark LS, Nemeth K, Gardner D, Dainoff MJ, Paasche J, Duffy M, et al. Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Oct; 23(5): 1365-79.
[17]	Petrovic M, Berg WP, Mark LS, Hughes MR. The impact of object weight, reach distance, discomfort and muscle activation on the location of preferred critical boundary during a seated reaching task. Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Dec; 44: 122-33.
[18]	Schimdt RA. A Schema Theory of Discrete Motor Skill Learning. Psychol Rev. 1975 Jul; 82(2): 225-60.
[19]	Dewey JA, Knoblich G. Do implicit and explicit measures of the sense of agency measure the same thing? 2014 PLos ONE 9910): e110118.