Age-related Changes in Body Sway When Standing with Eyes Closed or Open and on Stable and Unstable Surfaces

Hiroki Aoki^1, , Shinichi Demura² and Hiroshi Hirai³

¹National Institute of Technology, Fukui College, General course, Fukui, Japan

²Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan

³Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan

Cite this paper

Hiroki Aoki, Shinichi Demura and Hiroshi Hirai. Age-related Changes in Body Sway When Standing with Eyes Closed or Open and on Stable and Unstable Surfaces. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2018; 6(1):33-38. doi: 10.12691/AJSSM-6-1-7

Abstract

This study examined how the amount of body sway various by age when people are standing on either a stable or an unstable surface with eyes either open or closed. The participants were 83 healthy women ranging in age from their teens to their eighties (with 9 to 12 women in each of the eight 10-year cohorts). Body sway was measured for 60 s while the participants were standing on a force plate with foam rubber (stable posture) or without form rubber (unstable posture). Path length (in cm), envelopment area (in cm2), and the ratio between these two measures were selected as evaluation parameters. In a three-way analysis of visual, posture, and age factors, path length, and envelopment area showed a significant interaction. Path length was shorter with the rubber than without it for all age levels with the eyes open or closed. An age-level difference was found only when the eyes were open. The envelopment area was smaller with than without the rubber with the eyes open for all age levels except women in their thirties and for all age groups with the eyes closed. Again, a significant age-level difference was found only with the eyes open. The ratio of length to envelopment area demonstrated a significant main effect for factors of both posture and age level. It was greater without than with the foam rubber with the eyes open for all age levels except women from their twenties to their forties, and for all age levels with the eyes closed. Coefficients in the linear regression equations, calculated based on the means for each age level, were significant in for three parameters. Values of path length and envelopment area were smaller without than with the rubber, but no significant differences were found between these values with the eyes open and closed. In conclusion, body sway in all age levels is greater on a less stable surface and increases with age, but the effect of vision on body sway can be disregarded.

Keywords

aging, foam rubber, static balance

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	Horac FB, Shupert CL, Mirka A. (1989). Components of postural dyscontrol in the elderly: a review. Neurobiol. Aging 10 727-738.
[2]	Maki BE, McIlroy WE. (1996). Postural control in the older adult,. Clin. Geriatr. Med.12 635-658.
[3]	Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M (1998). Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol. 80(3). 1211-1221.
[4]	Gatev P, Thomas S, Kepple T, Hallett M. (1999). Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults. J Physiol. 514 915-928.
[5]	Loram ID, Kelly SM, Laike M. (2001). Human balancing of an inverted pendulum; is sway size controlled by ankle impedance? J Physiol. 523 879-891.
[6]	Ekdahl C, Jarnlo GB, Andersson SI. (1989). Standing balance in healthy subjects. Evaluation of a quantitative test battery on a force platform. Scand. J Rehabil. Med. 21(4) 187-95.
[7]	Hattori K, Starkes J, Takahashi T. (1992). The influence of age on variability of postural sway during the daytime. Japanese Journal of Human Posture 11 137-146.
[8]	Elliott C, Murray A (1998). Repeatability of body sway measurements; day-to-day variation measured by swaymagnetometry. Physiol. Meas. 19(2). 159-164.
[9]	Demura S, Yamaji S, Noda M, Kitabayashi T, Nagasawa Y. (2001). Examination of Parameters Evaluatingparameters evaluating the Centercenter of Foot Pressurefoot pressure in Static Standing Posturestatic standing posture from the Viewpointsviewpoints of Trialtrial-to-trial Reliabilityreliability and Interrelationships Among Parametersinterrelationships among parameters. Equilib. Res. 60(1). 44-55.
[10]	Fujimoto C, Murofushi T, Chihara Y, Ushio M, Sugawara K, Yamaguchi T, Yamasoba T, Iwaki S. (2009). Assessment of diagnostic of foam posturography for peripheral vestibular disorders: Analysis of parameters related to visual and somatosensory. Clinical Neurophysiology 120(7). 1408-1414.
[11]	Iwasaki S. (2011). Foam posturography. Equilibrium Res. 70(1). 43-45.
[12]	Khasnis A, Gokula R. (2003). “Romberg's test.” Journal of postgraduate medicinePostgraduate Medicine 49(2). 169-72.
[13]	Kitabayashi T, Demura S, Noda M, Imaoka K. (2003). Interrelationships between various parameters to evaluate body sway from the center of foot pressure in a static uplight posture-examination by domain and gender difference. Equilib. Res. 62(1) 34-42.
[14]	Wade G. M., Lindquist, R., Taylor, R. J., Treat-Jacobson, D. (1995). Optical flow, spatial orientation, and the control of posture in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology 50 51-58.
[15]	Vandervoort A. A. and McComas A. J (1986) Contractile changes in opposing muscles of the human ankle joint with aging,. J. Appl. Physiol. 61 361-367.
[16]	Lin SI, Woollacott M. (2005). Association between sensorimotor function and functional and reactive balance control in the elderly. Age Ageing 34(4) 358-363.
[17]	Kouzaki M and Masani K. (2012). Postural sway during quiet standing is related to physiological tremor and muscle volume in young and elderly adults. Gait and Posture 35(1) 11-17.
[18]	Thomas RB, Roger WE (2008) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. National strength and conditioning association. US.
[19]	Behzad H (2011) Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern. Med. Spring 2(2) 205-212.
[20]	Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[21]	Gurfinkel VS, Ivanenko YP, Levik YS, Babakova I (1995) Kinesthetic reference for human orthograde posture. Neurosci. 68 229-243.